![]() |
| Benelli Nova with variety of available ammunition. |
Consider the shotgun: traditional provider of meat for the pot, defender of hearth and home, and long regarded as the ultimate in anti-bad-guy ordnance. Having conducted a fair number of shotgun home-defense courses over the years, I've had the opportunity to see a lot of different people, with a lot of different levels of experience, handle a lot of different shotguns. However, a few similarities have emerged over time regarding people and their favorite scattergun. From the 58-year-old insurance adjuster to the 26-year-old police officer to the 33-year-old single mother, I've made the same observations time and time again. So with your kind indulgence, I'd like to look at a few of these items and the ways they can be addressed. After all, fixing things in training mode can help stave off catastrophe in reality mode.
For simplicity's sake, I'll divide the subjects I'm discussing into two categories. In this first part, we’ll look at shotgun accessories, and in a future installment, training with a shotgun.
Let's start with the add-ons. Ten years ago, the shotguns my students were bringing into class were pretty predictable: overwhelmingly, they were pump-action 12-gauge guns and were in pretty much the same configuration as they’d been on the day they left the factory. Today, I see a good number of semi-automatics. A plain unadorned pump gun is a bit of a rarity. It now seems that the variety, availability, and popularity of combat-themed accessories knows no limits. It stands to reason that not every aftermarket option is a good idea, let alone a necessity, on a home-defense gun. Here are some accessories that have demonstrated their value repeatedly.
![]() |
| Remington 870 with FAB Defense stock in folded position. |
Because I see lots of civilians looking for home-defense training, I see couples who have but one shotgun between them. In the past, this created some difficulties because the pair of users rarely had the same physical build. Recoil control is a big job with a 12-gauge defense gun, and it's only made harder if the gun is too long for the shooter using it. That's why I'm a big fan of the adjustable stocks available today on any shotgun that might find itself in the hands of more than one member of the household.
Today's adjustable buttstocks are modeled after the simple four- or six-position designs found on the military M-4 carbine and its legion of commercial clones. They’re easy to use and, as an important bonus, several of the better models feature recoil-reduction capability.
The Knoxx/Blackhawk SPEC-OPS was the first widely available such unit and is still the standard by which others are measured. At Black Wing Shooting Center, we've been testing a similar unit made by Advanced Technologies International (ATI) on a rental/training gun and are very pleased with the results. Also, we have worked with a FAB Defense stock, made in Israel, which adds a side-folding option as well. The bottom line on adjustable buttstocks for defensive guns is this: In 2012, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a gun that is too big for their frame. Combine an adjustable buttstock with one of the currently available reduced-recoil defensive ammunition products, and there is no reason that the shotgun can't be a viable means to repel invaders for just about anyone.
![]() |
| Remington and Benelli guns with sidesaddle ammo carriers. |
The home defense shotgun is a unique kind of firearm in any number of ways. If we're looking at a pump-action or semi-automatic shotgun, we see that they have a really interesting capability that our handguns and rifles don't: the ability to be ready to fire (or be fired, for that matter) while we are adding ammunition to the magazine. How cool!
I'm not going to examine and debate the tactical circumstances that put me into such a situation: I'm merely pointing out that I can grab an empty shotgun, drop one round onto the elevator, close the action, and have a gun that will go boom! if I need to press the trigger in defense of myself and my family. And once that round is chambered, if circumstances so permit, I can continue to feed rounds into the magazine while ready to engage a threat. This is where an on-board ammunition carrier makes sense.
Products such as the humble elastic cuff stretched over the stock and with loops to hold four or five rounds of ammo will do. There are pouches of various design and capacity that strap onto a conventional stock with hook-and-loop fasteners. But perhaps the ideal system is the shotgun sidesaddle. Numerous variants exist from numerous makers, but the essential idea is to mount a bracket holding extra shells to the side of the gun's receiver. This system gets the nod because it is generally easier to reach while keeping the gun in anything close to a shooting position. Also, if you recognize the wisdom of a recoil-reducing adjustable buttstock, you don't really have a place for an elastic cuff or strap-on pouch. In any event, an on-board ammunition carrier will make the home defense shotgun, loaded or not, into a true grab-and-go system, ideal in these uncertain times.
![]() |
| Tactical/breacher choke installed on Remington 870. |
Obviously, there are numerous other accessories you may consider. These are just the two examples I most commonly advocate to civilian home defenders. And of course there are items that I don't encourage for the homeowner's pump or semi-auto shotgun. In this category, one accessory has become common enough lately to merit discussion: the tactical/breacher choke.
From a home-defense perspective, this just doesn't bring much to the party. First, although I'll admit to not having the statistics close at hand, the need for a defender to breach an obstacle inside his own home has got to be pretty rare. Most military/law enforcement "door breacher" guns have either a muzzle device that has been welded to the gun or no device at all. The narrow threads used on screw-in shotgun choke tubes may not be up to the task.
Second, they add length to a long gun that we may have to manipulate in the confines of an interior hallway or other narrow space. Many of these chokes are topped with some sort of aggressively sharp serrations to better bite and hold doors and walls for proper standoff during breaching operations. They may well do this with any object we bump into while in the midst of a scary situation. A snagging hazard that adds unneeded length is difficult to endorse.
![]() |
| Narrow threads on tactical/breacher choke may have very little impact resistance. |
Lastly, tactical/breacher chokes are thought to have some utility as pain-compliance devices or enhancements that improve the shotgun's utility as a striking instrument should it become non-functional in its firearm role for whatever reason. While I would not argue that such a use is impossible, just ask any soldier how often they attach and use their bayonet in combat. For civilian home defenders, I prefer guns that are as short and snag-free as possible when playing "keep away" with a bad guy. In an extreme emergency, striking at the evildoer and then moving away are preferred.
I don't like breacher chokes as blunt-force weapons for the same reason I don't like (ugh!) rubber buckshot as a home-defense load: I don't think it’s a great idea to point a lethal weapon at another human being, operate it as designed, and expect it to produce non-lethal results.
Now, don't think I don't appreciate the cool factor. The fact is, I have bought and own stuff that has no real purpose other than to make me happy. I have no problem with someone having a tactical/breacher choke on their shotgun because they like it. But I caution people not to assign it duties to which it is unsuited. I advise all my students to replace the tactical choke with a flush-fit IC choke during home-defense duty in order to negate the possible disadvantages.
In summary, adjustable recoil-reducing stocks and on-board ammo carriers are good add-ons for your home-defense shotgun. Tactical/breacher chokes are less so. But it is our training and upkeep of the needed skill sets that really make the difference. In Part II, I’ll make some observations on shotgun training considerations for non-armed professionals, casual users, and home defenders.
15 Comments
If you can't handle a shotgun without adding a recoil-reducing stock, you shouldn't own one at all. Low-recoil ammo is enough to make the gun more controlable and comfortable to shoot. You neglected to mention a truly important accessory, a weapon light. Shoot at someone in the dark without one and you'll be in for a rude legal awakening.
Great article, but I have to disagree with the recoil reducing stocks and reduced recoil ammo. I'm a smaller guy (5'7'', 150lb) and I have no issue with a full power loads from my h/d gun. I can manage to put out a full tube (7rds), with a sight picture for each shot, in about 5 seconds. Also, I'd suggest a weapon mounted light for obvious reasons.
Thanks for reading the article and taking the time to comment Mark. I think that there is a huge and important difference between "I can't handle it" and "It's uncomfortable so I won't practice nearly as often as I should." There is likely no downside to making the gun less painful and if it can fit multiple users, so much the better. In terms of lights, I omit them because 1.) There is too much junk product out there, inviting all kinds of failure and 2.) I view "low light" shooting as an over-marketed problem in civilian terms- there is either enough light to see (for both parties) or there isn't. Thanks again.
I have two shot guns a 12 ga. & a 20 ga. The 12 is a pump & the 20 is a sigle shot break down. I use the 12 ga. most at meat shoots at my BPOE Elkes lodge. I don't use either for defence.
Thanks again to everyone who read the article and those who have taken the time to comment. I'm a big fan of recoil-reduction in any form that doesn't compromise reliability. There are those who may have trouble with the recoil of a HD 12-or20 guage shotgun and I think that it's great that those people can take advantage of these fearsome weapons. As far as gun-mounted lights go, I have no argument with quality equipment. But with my own two eyes I have seen literally hundreds of people with lights on their shotgun not use those lights when I turned down the range lights. But they're not plunged into inky mine-shaft darkness...so I wonder if it is as much a necessity for a civilian home user.
Andy, Great article. I have been a defensive shotgun fanatic for 35 years. I have always been a "suck it up buttercup" type when it comes to recoil. HOWEVER, the Knoxx stocks are amazing. Reducing recoill without compromising performasnce is a wonderful thing. AND I would much rather have a higher velocity round and a recoil-reducing stock than reducing the velocity of my projectile!
Thanks David! I think I was in my mid-to-late thirties when I put my ego aside and admitted that I really don't care much for recoil. And you're right- recoil reduction is not automatically performance reduction!
The bad guy certainly won't know it was reduced recoil ammo, so why beat yourself up with full power loads? Andy, you're right about there being a lot of junk lights (and other accessories) out there. Buying the best quality gear rarely disappoints.
Thanks for your thoughts, Mark- Because of the "junk factor" I felt that it was best to not say "stick a light on your gun." In fact, based on my observations I was planning to do an in-depth look at lights and the question of how needed they really are.
I love my Mossberg 590A1. I have added the side saddle and may eventually change the stock to Knoxx. Beyond that it shall stay relatively unadorned. As for load preference, I use #4 buck shot for the slightly lower recoil and better control while maintaining good results down range. I'm new to PDN and so far I'm loving it!
Welcome aboard, JustDave and thank you for taking the time to comment. That 590A1 is a workhorse and should give you a lifetime of solid service. As you know, it's our training that will see us through, not the stuff bolted onto the gun. That said, an add-on that makes sense never hurts! Be sure to check out the Premium Membership for access to more great content.
My wife loves her Spec-Ops Stock... There's a lot to say for comfort with women using Shotgun for training and home defense...
i own an ithaca deer slayer they make a good home defense gun u can buy them still pretty cheap i dare u to try & wear one out & they come 12 or 20 ga got rifled sights
I'd like to see an article on the difference in EFFECTIVENESS between .20 gauge and .12 gauge, in home-defense situations. Wife is 5'2", I've had 2 serious right-shoulder injuries. Can we effectively use a .20, or is that giving-up too much knock-down power?
Thanks everyone, for reading and for commenting. @Rick Munoz- I agree wholeheartedly that if the gun is obnoxious or painful to shoot, there won't be a whole lot of training happening and all you've got is an expensive and poorly-designed ball bat! Thanks to products such as the Spec-Ops stock, no need for discomfort- it's a solid win! @1911Ithica- I'm looking forward to trying out one of the new Ithica shotguns- I've seen a couple come through class and they look and act like a good gun. @Stan Copeland- That's a great idea for an article. For what it's worth, there is a good selection of 20 gauge ammo available for HD use and while a 20 ga. might give up a little raw energy compared to the 12ga. it is still massive compared to a handgun. I would not feel under-gunned in the least with a 20 gauge defense gun. Combine a 20 ga. pump with a recoil-reducing stock and you will have a very comfortable and controllable gun capable of any home defense task.