Comments on: Glock Model 42 in Perspective https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/ Personal defense videos, classes and techniques for defensive skill development Mon, 06 Feb 2023 02:27:08 +0000 hourly 1 By: John https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1286142 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:44:07 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1286142 Bought the g42 last August and have put around 500 rounds thru it with absolutely no problems . Fits my hand well with the extended magazine and super accurate . My daughter and 14 year old granddaughter love it as well . Great pistol highly recommended !

]]>
By: John R https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140609 Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:25:15 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140609 Purchased my Glock 42 and ran Hornady Tap, critical defense, Winchester white box and Remington 88 grain HTP trhough it. All but the Remington HTP had problems with stove piping, not ejecting etc. I bought several hundred rounds of Remington and shot 300 through the gun with no problem. Definitely touchy about the ammo it likes.

]]>
By: Respekt https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140608 Sun, 04 Jan 2015 23:33:12 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140608 I’ve had the G42 for about for months now. LOVE it. It’s my ccw and I’m glad I didn’t go with bodyguard or lcp as 1.I dont have tiny hands 2. I’m used to the glock feel. I have owned a G23 , which was the go to for many years, have a G22 for the house, and a G19 for normal carry. I’ve put roughly 500 rounds through the G42 … I did experience a small issue with some less the good quality ammo I ran through it when I first purchased. After that issue I read up and switched to Winchester and fiocchi for target and hornady for carry. Again None issues since the switch VERY HAPPY.

]]>
By: Richard M. Wilkens https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140607 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:59:31 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140607 I have never had a problem with my glock 42 which I got in April and have carried it appendix ever since. I also have a glock 26 for home defense which is situated next to my chair. Never a problem with with weapon, that is why they call them golcks.

]]>
By: Jerry Bailey https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140606 Fri, 25 Jul 2014 03:46:49 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140606 Fifth paragraph down should read “when pistol pointed down and slide lowered slowly the shell usually pushes firing pin back out of the way. (not firing pin pushes shell).

In the sixth paragraph I consider it a good thing when nice slick layer of copper from the shell coats a small part of the extractor.

Eleventh paragraph down should read that the slide, when pulled back and released, will outrun the striker when pointed down, thereby no inappropriate contact between the firing pin and cartridge shell (obviously by design).

]]>
By: Jerry Bailey https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140605 Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:05:21 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140605 I think glock will make an upgrade in the Model 42 next year. Not a big deal but to avoid confusion.

The returning slide is about “three sixteenths inch” open when the unlocked (and floating) firing pin gets kicked back. (When pistol pointed downward only, and empty, so you can watch it work).

Unfortunately the rear of the cartridge leaves the magazine when it is about “one half inch” open. And if an overly gentle person is trying not to loudly chamber a round (riding the slide) the top of the head of the cartridge will hit the firing pin. That is only if the pistol is pointed downward so gravity has the firing pin down.

If the pistol is pointed upward there is no problem because the firing pin (the striker) is again responding to gravity and staying back, in this case away from the breech face.

So again, after cleaning you will be loading your house gun, or carry gun. If you point the pistol at the floor and gently lower the slide it will either lock open with the shell stuck under the firing pin, or more likely you will just feel a bump as it pushes the shell out of the way. And you will probably worry (as I did) that the pistol is not feeding smoothly.

All my glocks need to cycle normal speed. If no other reason the extractor spring is relatively strong and the point where the extractor first meets the cartridge groove is not polished. It does seem to get covered with brass, from the shell, after firing several times. (Normal break in perhaps).

And (like in most pistols) the more shells that are in the magazine, and the stronger the magazine spring, the more momentum the shells will exert when they all move up one place pushing the top shell under the extractor.

Those of us that learned to baby our handguns back in revolver days listened when the trainers told us not to slam the revolving cylinders closed with a flip of the wrist like in Hollywood gangster movies. Now we are told to pull the slide back and let it fly (as is normal for it when shooting).

Abuse is when you let the slide fly/slam closed with no ammunition in the magazine, sending it crashing into the breach face. Yes there are target shooters that dry fire over a thousand times a week. Some of them let the slide fly with an empty magazine. Most probably only half cock the slide enough to reset the trigger, and lower the slide the rest of the way.

I have only owned my glock 42 about two weeks and not fired it yet. I already love it almost as much as my glock 17, and more than my glock model 22. It is light, it is the right size for me right now, and I do not need a magazine loading tool to put a few rounds in it.

Most people are probably like me in aiming a handgun at the floor for the first dry fire. Or when cycling the first round from magazine into chamber. I was raised on a wood floor with dirt under it and feel pretty safe about it. Fortunately the glock 42 slide will outrun gravity when you point it down to cycle it.

Too bad Glock did not put a model 42 manual in the box, and explain the new parts. But they have been so nice to me in the past I will sorta give them a pass this time. Most people will not need more than the model 17 manual that comes with, this pistol, and probably all glock pistols.

I went through a lot of distress trying to find the “bump” when first chambering my new pistol. Both of my new magazines are higher than average at front.
And one of my magazines was not as smooth as the other. Thumb a round out of it and the case mouth hit’s the elevated metal end of that magazine firmly.

Yup, I polished it excessively prior to finding/reading about the floating firing pin jams, and watching mine lock up when chambered slowly. But I learned a lot and it will have been cheap at the price, if I need to buy a new magazine.

Almost every time I buy a new pistol I learn something valuable about evaluating the next purchase.
Don’t buy it during the first year.
Don’t buy it if no spare parts are available yet.
Don’t buy it if no manual with an exploded parts diagram of the pistol you are buying.

But I am not getting any younger and wanted one of these really bad. And they really stand behind their products.
And on and on it goes.

]]>
By: Andreas https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140604 Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:34:13 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140604 3 weeks ago I finally got my 42 and I really like it. What is even more important is that my wife can handle the gun pretty well and she likes it.
Yes I figured out that mostly the slide doesn’t lock back after the last round and I have to find a way to fix this problem. Otherwise I had not a single failure with feeding or stovepiping. I shot PMC, HPR and Fed Hydra.
I like it a lot and so does my wife and I would recommend it to anybody who is looking for a very concealable gun with light recoil.

]]>
By: David https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140603 Sat, 24 May 2014 13:52:41 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140603 I looked at the G42. It was smaller than my SA XD subcompact 40 3″-but not by much.
I needed a defensive pistol that could be concealed in shorts and T-shirts for the summer. Thus the Ruger LCP

]]>
By: Jim Balog https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140602 Fri, 23 May 2014 13:33:55 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140602 I had an early Glock 42. I must say I was totally underwhelmed and dissapointed by it’s failures to feed with every type of ammo used ! It went back to Glock, and after its return I could not wait to get rid of it! I went back to my old standby a Ruger LCP with Galloway precision trigger.

]]>
By: Gene814 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/glock-model-42-in-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1140601 Fri, 23 May 2014 12:47:03 +0000 http://personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=2346#comment-1140601 I have shot Fed American Eagle & Fiocci in my G42. I experienced no malfunctions. Great gun, but not a pocket gun like my Ruger LCP or Diamondback DB380.

]]>