Comments on: The Semantics of Civilian Firearms Education https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/ Personal defense videos, classes and techniques for defensive skill development Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:52:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: GEORGE https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4832091 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:52:44 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4832091 In reply to James Danforth.

I was told in the 90’s that if handguns by weight and volume were imported by the cartels rather than marijuana, there could be 30 million illegal handguns imported per year. Making firearms illegal would simply create, as you say, a vast black market. For example, Customs seized a shipment of 350 Chinese select-fire AKs in Los Angeles in 1993 intended for a large gang.

]]>
By: Johnny Bans https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4832041 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:21:49 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4832041 “Of course the term ‘assault rifle’ is a manufactured negative term…”

When Hitler used it, correct. As far as in America, it’s an actual military term. ‘Assault weapon’ is the made up one.

]]>
By: Ed https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4713771 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:57:56 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4713771 In reply to Bill.

Bill, it is really unfortunate we have to use euphemisms so we don’t offend the thin skinned. You recall when guns were called “heat”? That could stand for “health enhancing application tool”. And my spare mag is my herk, “health enhancing replenishment kit”. I carry for the health and benefit of me and my family.

]]>
By: Customer Service https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4713764 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:03:39 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4713764 In reply to H Ray Taylor.

Hello Ray,

Thank you for your feedback. I have forwarded your comment to the proper department. We value your opinion, and it will help with the development of our online streaming community. We will continue to listen and work hard for your complete satisfaction.

Sincerely,
Sarah
Personal Defense Network Video Membership

]]>
By: H Ray Taylor https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4713749 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:36:53 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4713749 One of the best documents I have ever read on how to use correct wording in our conversations. I have been a member of your organization for several years and try to read each document you present and watch the videos as well. Keep up the good work. I carry my defense tool as I serve as a greeter in the kids ministry at my church.

]]>
By: Jerry https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4713743 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:55:19 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4713743 In reply to Richard.

“WEAPON”. Two forms of the word , conjure up lethality . If you are military , it is a “weapon” . If a civilian, your “firearm” can be used as a “WEAPON”. One is primarily USED AS A WEAPON, and that is the sole purpose. A car is a weapon if used in a careless manner. I prefer Personal Defense Device. It is apparent you have not tried to “have a civil discussion” with those on the “left” .

]]>
By: johnh0121 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4627881 Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:06:27 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4627881 This is Ironic that I sent to Policeone back on 9-28-21 the almost exact same article and explained I have been pushing this very same point almost verbatim since 1980’s . As a matter of fact I submitted an article in the 80’s to SWAT magazine and a similar topic regard Magazines vs Clips and how not using proper terminology affects your professionalism as well as your credibility and knowledge and that terminology can be your enemy when not used correctly.

]]>
By: Rusty Baillie https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4627218 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:39:31 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4627218 Good basic principle.
You are maybe extending the concept here to a degree of PR awareness.
As our 2A rights are subject to political pressures, it pays us to also play the political game…….in our favor.
However, if it goes to far, our righteous stance gets a big bogged down in euphemisms and over-apology. Lets choose some sensible, reasonable, neutral terminology and have the courage of our convictions to stick to that.
PR is certainly important, but I don’t want to be confused if I have to fight for my life.

]]>
By: Matt https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4627202 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:01:31 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4627202 The newest scare word is “ghost Gun”

]]>
By: Thomas https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/post/semantics-civilian-firearms-education/comment-page-1/#comment-4626714 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:07:23 +0000 https://www.personaldefensenetwork.com/?p=225737#comment-4626714 In reply to Shawn.

Shawn your comments regarding “a well regulated militia” are grounded on 20th Century interpretations. When the amendment was written all males age 16-60 were automatically defined as ‘Militia” and thus was the reasoning for using that language. There is plenty of evidence to support my retort here you just have to take the time to learn the history and understand the language of the day, not the language of today. This is something that seems to be lost on today’s generation not to mention the fact that the left tries to twist and manipulate the argument in favor of their disingenuous reasoning and misstatement of facts not supported by either logic or reason.

]]>